Search for: "DISTRICT VENUES LLC" Results 1 - 20 of 836
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Sep 2017, 9:21 pm by Patent Docs
By Andrew Williams -- We recently reported that Chief Judge Stark of the District of Delaware interpreted the second prong of the patent venue statute, 28 U.S.C. [read post]
Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC, nearly one-third of all patent suits filed were filed in the Eastern District of Texas. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 7:31 am by Dennis Crouch
Whitesboro Independent School District Ironworks Patents LLC v. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 8:05 am by Docket Navigator
"In its original Answer to [plaintiff's] Complaint, [defendant] had stated that it 'does not dispute that venue is proper in this judicial district.'. . . [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC held that the word "resides" in the patent venue statute, 28 U.S.C. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 1:39 pm by Eileen McDermott
The CAFC explained that the district court erred in failing to consider pre-litigation tactics by Ikorongo Technology LLC (Ikorongo Tech) and Ikorongo Texas LLC aimed at purposely manipulating venue in the case. [read post]
21 May 2018, 6:05 am by Tryn T. Stimart and Jean E. Dassie
The Central District of California in Realtime Data LLC v Nexenta System held that a domestic corporation “resides” in the state of its incorporation “only in the judicial district in which it maintains in principal place of business. [read post]
25 May 2017, 7:32 am by Docket Navigator
"In light of the recent United State Supreme Court case, TC Heartland LLC.v Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC (May 22, 2017), the parties are directed to brief whether venue is proper in this district. . . . [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 8:30 am by Keith Grady
Kraft Foods Group Brands, LLC, 137 S.Ct. 1514 (2017), the Supreme Court held that patent venue is controlled exclusively by 28 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 7:32 am by Docket Navigator
There was a district court split over whether a challenge to venue was waived if the moving party delayed in raising this issue. . . . [read post]